for postforms in inlines of pages which follow a certain scheme, it might not be required to set the title for each individual post, but to automatically set the title and show no input box prompting for it. this can either be based on timestamp formatting, or use the already existing munging mechanism, which appends numbers to page titles in case that page already exists.
two patches (b568eb25, 34bc82f2) set inline up for that, adding an additional
parameter. if that is given, the regular input of the inline postform will be
replaced with a hidden input of that text. in addition, the empty title is
permitted (both for autotitle and regular titles, as they go in the same GET
title). as the empty page title is illegal, munging is used,
resulting in ascending numeric page titles to be created.
the second patch is actually a one-liner, filtering the title through strftime.
What's your use-case for not prompting for the title at all? I can see madduck's requirement for the title he typed in (say, "foo") being transformed into 2009/07/26/foo or something (I name blog posts like that myself), but I can't quite see the use for entirely automatic titles.
However, if that's really what you want, I suspect your code could be extended so it also solves madduck's second request on more customisable titlepage function.
potential user interaction issues
this has two side effects which have to be considered: first, the empty page title is accepted also in normal postforms (previously, this resulted in a "bad page name" error); second, entering a percent sign in that field might result in unexpexted strftime substitution (strftime might not even substitute for common uses of percent as in "reach 10% market share", but might in others as in "the 10%-rule").
both can be circumvented by using another GET parameter for autotexts, as implemented in 40dc10a4.
this patch still does not work perfectly; especially, it should make a distinction between "autotitle is set but equal ''" (in which case it should create a page named
1.mdwn, and "autotitle is not set, and title is equal ''" (in which case it should display the old error message) --chrysn
potential security issues
- the autotitle's value is directly output through the template (but that's done in other places as well, so i assume it's safe)
- i don't know if anything bad can happen if unfiltered content is passed to POSIX::strftime.