The IkiWiki::pagetitle
function does not respect title changes via meta.title
. It really should, so that links rendered with htmllink
get the proper title in the link text.
--madduck
It is possible to set a Page-Title in the meta-plugin, but that one isn't reused in parentlinks. This patch may fix it.
- I give pagetitle the full path to a page.
- I redefine the 'pagetitle'-sub to deal with it.
- to maintain compatibility for IkiWikis without the meta-plugin, i added a 'basename' to the Original-pagetitle.
diff -c /usr/share/perl5/IkiWiki/Render.pm.distrib /usr/share/perl5/IkiWiki/Render.pm *** /usr/share/perl5/IkiWiki/Render.pm.distrib Wed Aug 6 07:34:55 2008 --- /usr/share/perl5/IkiWiki/Render.pm Tue Aug 26 23:29:32 2008 *************** *** 102,108 **** $template->param( title => $page eq 'index' ? $config{wikiname} ! : pagetitle(basename($page)), wikiname => $config{wikiname}, content => $content, backlinks => $backlinks, --- 102,108 ---- $template->param( title => $page eq 'index' ? $config{wikiname} ! : pagetitle($page), wikiname => $config{wikiname}, content => $content, backlinks => $backlinks, diff -c /usr/share/perl5/IkiWiki/Plugin/parentlinks.pm.distrib /usr/share/perl5/IkiWiki/Plugin/parentlinks.pm *** /usr/share/perl5/IkiWiki/Plugin/parentlinks.pm.distrib Wed Aug 6 07:34:55 2008 --- /usr/share/perl5/IkiWiki/Plugin/parentlinks.pm Tue Aug 26 23:19:43 2008 *************** *** 44,50 **** "height_$height" => 1, }; $path.="/".$dir; ! $title=IkiWiki::pagetitle($dir); $i++; } return @ret; --- 44,50 ---- "height_$height" => 1, }; $path.="/".$dir; ! $title=IkiWiki::pagetitle($path); $i++; } return @ret; diff -c /usr/share/perl5/IkiWiki.pm.distrib /usr/share/perl5/IkiWiki.pm *** /usr/share/perl5/IkiWiki.pm.distrib Wed Aug 6 07:48:34 2008 --- /usr/share/perl5/IkiWiki.pm Tue Aug 26 23:47:30 2008 *************** *** 792,797 **** --- 792,799 ---- my $page=shift; my $unescaped=shift; + $page=basename($page); + if ($unescaped) { $page=~s/(__(\d+)__|_)/$1 eq '_' ? ' ' : chr($2)/eg; } diff -c /usr/share/perl5/IkiWiki/Plugin/meta.pm.distrib /usr/share/perl5/IkiWiki/Plugin/meta.pm *** /usr/share/perl5/IkiWiki/Plugin/meta.pm.distrib Wed Aug 6 07:34:55 2008 --- /usr/share/perl5/IkiWiki/Plugin/meta.pm Tue Aug 26 23:30:58 2008 *************** *** 3,8 **** --- 3,9 ---- package IkiWiki::Plugin::meta; use warnings; + no warnings 'redefine'; use strict; use IkiWiki 2.00; *************** *** 289,294 **** --- 290,319 ---- } } + sub IkiWiki::pagetitle ($;$) { + my $page=shift; + my $unescaped=shift; + + if ($page =~ m#/#) { + $page =~ s#^/##; + $page =~ s#/index$##; + if ($pagestate{"$page/index"}{meta}{title}) { + $page = $pagestate{"$page/index"}{meta}{title}; + } else { + $page = IkiWiki::basename($page); + } + } + + if ($unescaped) { + $page=~s/(__(\d+)__|_)/$1 eq '_' ? ' ' : chr($2)/eg; + } + else { + $page=~s/(__(\d+)__|_)/$1 eq '_' ? ' ' : "$2;"/eg; + } + + return $page; + } + package IkiWiki::PageSpec; sub match_title ($$;@) {
A few quick notes about it:
- Using
inline
would avoid the redefinition + code duplication.- A few plugins would need to be upgraded.
- It may be necessary to adapt the testsuite in
t/pagetitle.t
, as well.It was actually more complicated than expected. A working prototype is now in my
meta
branch, see my userpage for the up-to-date url. Thus tagging patch. --intrigeriJoey, please consider merging my
meta
branch. --intrigeri
So, looking at your meta branch: --Joey
- Inter-page dependencies. If page A links to page B, and page B currently
has no title, then A will display the link as "B". Now page B is modified
and a title is added. Nothing updates "A".
The added overhead of rebuilding every page that links to B when B is
changed (as the
indexhtml
hook of the po plugin does) is IMHO a killer. That could be hundreds or thousands of pages, making interactive editing way slow. This is probably the main reason I had not attempted this whole thing myself. IMHO this calls for some kind of intellegent dependency handler that can detect when B's title has changed and only rebuild pages that link to B in that case. - Looks like some plugins that use
pagetitle
to format it for display were not changed to usenicepagetitle
(for example, rename). But most of those callers intend to display the page name as a title, but including the parent directories in the path. (Ie, "renaming foo/page title to bar/page title" -- you want to know it's moved from foo to bar.)nicepagetitle
does not allow doing that since it always takes thebasename
. I don't like the name
nicepagetitle
. It's not very descriptive, is it? And it seems very confusing to choose whether to use the "nice" or original version. My hope is that adding a second function is unnecessary. As I understand it, you added a new function for two reasons: 1) It needs the full page name, not basename. 2)titlepage(pagetitle($page))
reversability.1) If you look at all the callers Of
pagetitle
most of them pass a complete page name, not just the basename. In most casespagetitle
is used to display the full name of the page, including any subdirectory it's in. So why not just make it consitently be given the full name of the page, with another argument specifying if we want to get back just the base name.2) I can't find any code that actually uses the reversability like that. The value passed to
titlepage
always comes from some external source. Unless I missed one.- The use of
File::Spec->rel2abs
is a bit scary. - Does it really make sense to call
pagetitle
on the meta title in meta'snicepagetitle
? What if the meta title is something like "foo_bar" -- that would be changed to "foo bar". - parentlinks is changed to use
nicepagetitle(bestlink($page, $path))
. Won'tbestlink
return "" if the parent page in question does not exist? backlinks()
is changed to add an additionaltitle
field to the hash returned, but AFAICS this is not used in the template.- Shouldn't
Render.pm
use nicepagetitle when getting the title for the page template? Then meta would not need to override the title in thepagetemplate
hook. (Although this would eliminate handling oftitle_overridden
-- but that is little used and would not catch all the other ways titles can be overridden with this patch anyway.)
I'm not a reviewer or anything, but can I chime in on changes to pagetitle? I don't think having meta-titles in wikilinks and the parentlinks path by default is necessarily a good thing. I don't consider the meta-title of a page as used in
<title>
to be the same thing as the short title you want in those contexts - IMO, the meta-title is the "formal" title of the page, enough to identify it with no other context, and frequently too long to be used as a link title or a parentlink, whereas the parentlinks title in particular should be some abbreviated form that's enough to identify it in context. tbm expressed a similar opinion when I was discussing ikiwiki with him at the weekend.It's a matter of taste whether wikilinks are "like a parentlink" or "like a
<title>
"; I could be persuaded either way on that one.An example from my site: this page is the parent of this page with a title too long to use in the latter's parentlinks; I think the titles of both those pages are too long to use as wikilink text too. Similarly, tbm's page about Debian on Orion devices from Buffalo can simply be called "Buffalo" in context.
Having a
[[!meta abbrev="..."]]
that took precedence over title in parentlinks and possibly wikilinks might be a good way to fix this? Or if your preference goes the other way, perhaps a[[!meta longtitle=""]]
could take precedence when generating the<title>
and the title that comes after the parentlinks. --smcvI think you've convinced me. (I had always had some doubt in my mind as to whether using titles in all these other places would make sense.)
Instead of meta abbrev, you could have a meta pagename that overrides the page name displayed everywhere (in turn overridden by meta title iff the page's title is being displayed). But is this complexity needed? We have meta redir, so if you want to change the name of a page, you can just rename it, and put in a stub redirection page so links still work.
This leaves the ?po plugin, which really does need a way to change the displayed page name everywhere, and at least a subset of the changes in the meta branch are needed to support that.
(This would also get around my concern about inter-page dependency handling, since po contains a workaround for that, and it's probably acceptable to use potentially slow methods to handle this case.) --Joey
I'm glad to implement whatever decision we'll make, but I don't clearly understand what this discussion's conclusion is. It seems like we agree at least on one point: meta page titles shall not be displayed all over the place by default; I have therefore disabled
meta_overrides_page_title
by default in mymeta
branch.My next question is then: do we only want to satisfy the
po
plugin needs? Or do we want to allow people who want this, such as madduck, to turn on a config switch so that meta page titles are displayed as wikilinks titles? In the latter case, what level of configurability do we want? I can think of a quite inelegant way to implement full configurability, and provide a configuration switch for every place where links are displayed, such as wikilinks, parentlinks, etc., but I don't think the added bonus is worth the complexity of it.I think we can roughly split the needs into three categories:
- never display any modified page title in links; this is the current behaviour, and we should keep it as the default one
- display modified page titles only at well chosen places; that could be "manual" wikilinks, I mean those generated by the
link
,camelcase
& al. plugins, the recentchanges page, and maybe a few other places; keep the usual pagename-based title for every other link, such as the parentlinks ones. The inter-page dependency problem remains, though. As a first step, I'm in favour of the "slow, but correct" implementation, with a big warning stating that enabling this option can make a wiki really sluggish; if someone really wants this to work fast, he/she'll implement a clever dependency handler- display modified page titles all over the place; IMHO, we should implement only the bits needed so that the
po
plugin can set this up, rather than provide this as a user-configurable option.So my question is: do we want to implement the #2 case, or not? I propose myself to only implement #1 and #3 to start with, but do it in a way that leaves room for #2.
I agree, we should concentrate on getting just enough functionality for the po plugin, because I want to merge the po plugin soon. If #2 gets tackled later, we will certianly have all kinds of fun. no matter what is done for the po plugin. --Joey
For the record: I've gotten used to the lack of this feature, and it now seems much less important to me than it was when initially developing the po plugin. So, I'm hereby officially removing this from my plate. If anyone else wants to start from scratch, or from my initial work, I'm happy to review the po-related part of things -- just drop me an email in this case. --intrigeri