Any setting to disable having a discussion of a discussion? The features page says every page, but I don't want every page. I do want discussion subpage, but I don't want to have, for example: discussion/ discussion/ discussion. -- JeremyReed
Discussion pages should clearly be a special case that don't get Discussion links put at the top... aaand.. done! --Joey
This bug appears to have returned. For example, discussion has a Discussion link. -- schmonz
Lots of case issues this time. Audited for and fixed them all. done --Joey
Joey, I've just seen that you closed that bug in ikiwiki 1.37, but it seems you fixed it only for English "discussion" page. The bug still occurs for the international "discussion" pages. I have backported ikiwiki 1.40 and I can see "Dyskusja" link on my Polish "dyskusja" pages. --Paweł
Yes, I missed that string when internationalizing ikiwiki, fixed now.
Thanks a lot for the quick fix, Joey! It works for me
BTW, I had to apply the patch manually, because I have a problem with building ikiwiki 1.41 Debian package:
ptecza@devel2:~/svn/ikiwiki$ LANG=C dpkg-buildpackage -uc -us -rfakeroot [...] make[2]: Entering directory `/home/ptecza/svn/ikiwiki/po' msgfmt -o bg.mo bg.po msgfmt -o cs.mo cs.po msgfmt -o es.mo es.po msgfmt -o fr.mo fr.po msgfmt -o gu.mo gu.po msgfmt -o pl.mo pl.po Merging ikiwiki.pot and sv.pomsgmerge: sv.po: warning: Charset missing in header. Message conversion to user's charset will not work. sv.po:10:2: parse error sv.po:10: keyword "mine" unknown sv.po:14: keyword "r2262" unknown sv.po:37:2: parse error sv.po:37: keyword "mine" unknown sv.po:43: keyword "r2262" unknown sv.po:52:2: parse error sv.po:52: keyword "mine" unknown sv.po:56: keyword "r2262" unknown msgmerge: found 9 fatal errors make[2]: *** [sv.po] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/ptecza/svn/ikiwiki/po' make[1]: *** [extra_build] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/ptecza/svn/ikiwiki' make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
I think you should be notified about it --Paweł
You have an unresolved svn conflict in some files in po, looks like.
Thanks for the hint! You're absolutely right again, Joey! It's because of I always do
svn up
command (for CVS repocvs up
is enough ) and I never usesvn status
command. Yes, now I know I should do itFirst I removed conflicting
sv.po
file and next I updated it and it has resolved the problem. --Paweł