It would be nice for make coverage
(or something) to produce a HTML
test-coverage report. I found this very useful for test-driven development of
?trail.
Limitations of the current branch, which uses Devel::Cover:
- Some tests use
./blib
and some use.
so coverage gets split between the two copies of each module; not a problem for ?trail which only has one test.
How annoying. I think in at least some cases there is reason to use
./blib
-- perhaps everything that users.
should be changed to use it. --Joey
- The ?git and ?mercurial plugins want to
chdir
, and so does Devel::Cover, so they fight. For now, those tests are disabled undermake coverage
.
--smcv