It would be great if it were possible to support multi-row table headers in the table plugin, so you could do e.g.

    [[!table  header="""
    Name | Platform ||
    | Windows | Mac | Linux
    """ data="""
    ikiwiki | ‧ | ✓ | ✓
    """]]

-- Jon

This seems like weird overloading of the header parameter - it's table data, except when it isn't.

My first cut (now rebased out of existence I think) introduced a new "headerblock" parameter, but trying to clearly document the interaction of data/headerblock/header parameters was too awkward. -- Jon

Perhaps something like this would be easier to use in practice? (and also more featureful )

[[!table  header="2 rows 1 column" data="""
Name | Platform ||
| Windows | Mac | Linux
ikiwiki | no | yes | yes
Starcraft | yes | yes | via Wine
"""]]

Thanks for your prompt feedback!

This would probably be good, yes, and having mixed row/column headers is definitely a nice-to-have. I don't relish the prospect of writing the parser but I see you've made a stab already...

One thing you'd lose, but it's debatable whether this is valuable, would be to have the header defined in the directive, and the remaining table data declared in an external CSV. -- Jon

intended to be rendered like

Name	Platform
	Windows	Mac	Linux
ikiwiki	no	yes	yes
Starcraft	yes	yes	via Wine

(Deliberately switching to plain-text to make it more obvious what's a <th> and what's <td>.)

Vague pseudocode for parsing headers (possibly even valid Perl, I'm not sure):

my ($header_rows, $header_cols);
while ($header =~ s/(\d*)\W*(\w+)//) {
    my $n = ($1 or 0);
    my $what = $2;
    if ($what =~ m/rows?/) {
        $header_rows = $n;
    }
    elif ($what =~ m/col(?:umn)?s?/) {
        $header_cols = $n;
    }
}

and it would even be fairly easy to extend to support (first|last|)\W*(\d*)\W*(\w+) later, e.g. header="1 row, first 2 cols, last column".

--smcv

To be clear I think your suggestion is a good one, but my hack has addressed my immediate need so it's the one I'm deploying at $ork for the time being. I'm unlikely to have time to implement this solution in the near future. -- Jon

I'd quite like to revisit this if that's ok. I'm still carrying a fork of table.pm locally to add this feature as I find it so useful. The main objection you made back in 2014 seems to be overloading the header= parameter, and I agree that this is not ideal. So I'm happy to resubmit this with an alternative parameter name for the new purpose. But I balked at the idea of implementing something like an NLP processor to define the header range. And I must stress how useful it is in practise to separate out the header definition from the data: quite often I don't want headers in my CSV files at all, for example, so I can perform rudimentary analysis on them with command line tools without having to factor in a header line (how many records? = wc -l; sorting on fields simply with sort -k etc.). Having them separate means I can have machine-generated or manipulated CSV files of data and then use ikiwiki to mark them up for human reading, but change or regenerate the data quickly and easily underneath.

I'd appreciate your take on the above suggestions smcv before I roll my sleeves up. Thanks! — Jon (2018-09-24)

I continue to think that the header parameter shouldn't be sometimes a description of which parts of the table are header, and sometimes the header data itself; so if you want an inline header, it should indeed have a distinct name.

If you can think of a good name for the new parameter, and can document it reasonably clearly, then I would be OK with having a separate parameter that is the externally-provided header. I don't know what the right name for that parameter would be: headercontent or headerblock is unwieldy but I can't think of anything better.

It would maybe simplify things to make it mutually exclusive with header, but then you wouldn't be able to express things like "the first column of my CSV is a header, the first row is just an ordinary row, and please add this literal header row to the top".

It might help to write the documentation and/or tests first, and then implement it afterwards, when you have an "API" you're happy with.

Corner cases:

How would it work if you want to add a literal header column on the left rather than adding a literal header row on the top? If you add both, what happens at the top left corner?

Is it necessary to be able to add header columns on the right (for RTL languages?), or header rows (footer rows, I suppose) on the bottom?

--smcv